lunes 15 de octubre de 2007

The Photo Cristina Doesn't Want You To See?

Take a good look at this picture. What do you see? Anything out of the ordinary?

Keep looking.

See anything odd yet?

If not, you either have bad vision or you're not the kind of person who is obsessed with appearance and aesthetic propriety. Apparently, what Cristina Fernández de Kirchner sees in this photo is a pair of XXL-sized legs - hers. Compare her legs with those of Karolina Rabolini, the ex-model and wife of Argentine Vice President Daniel Scioli.

Are Cristina's legs extra large or Rabolini's extra small? Perhaps both. But who really cares? Apparently, quite a few people. The weekly news magazine Noticias placed this picture in a recent article about the cost of Cristina's election bid. Reportedly, her campaign has cost taxpayers around $130 million pesos, more than any other for a non-sitting president.

What's frustrating about this picture - and the fact that, according to Noticias, so many people have paid attention to it - is that Cristina has given us little reason to talk about anything else. Cristina is clearly a very bright and passionate politician. As a presidential candidate, she must have many thoughtful ideas about how she would change the country. Right?

What does Cristina think about the state of affairs in Argentina today? If elected, what kind of policies would she pursue? Does she agree with her husband, President Nestor Kirchner, on all things political? Does she approve of the way he has handled inflation and the controversy at the national statistics office, INDEC?

Earlier this month a group of protesters - or piqueteros - blocked access to a bridge in Corrientes Province. The group does this every Tuesday, reported newspaper La Nacion. But this time the protesters blocked access to an ambulance, which was rushing to deliver blood to a hospital patient battling Leukemia. Border guard agents stood by as protesters blocked the path and assaulted the ambulance driver.

Raúl Gaúna, the 28 year-old patient who needed a blood transfusion, died. Similar incidents have occurred in other provinces, yet protesters have paid no consequences. What does Cristina think about this? Her husband's policies encourage law enforcement officials to avoid "repressing" social protests. They have a right to protest, so goes the view. But didn't the dying patient also have a right to live, even if for just another minute? Can the government better balance the rights of piqueteros with those of people whose lives are disrupted - or even ended - by protests?

Polls show Cristina will likely become Argentina's next president. Ideally, she would openly address this and other questions so voters could decide if she deserves to run the country. But she continues to remain silent. Why?

Cristina is often compared with US Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton. The two have a lot in common. They're also quite different. Consider even their web sites. Hillary's has a picture or two here and there, but mainly her site is devoid of photos. A born wonk, her site is filled with information about policy goals and detailed plans for reforming health care, education, the economy and foreign policy. Cristina's site, meanwhile, is largely a photo gallery, with video and a few speeches here and there. But where Cristina has a tab for "Fotos," Hillary instead has a tab for "Issues," where she lays out policy proposals.

Of course, none of this means Hillary would be a good president or Cristina a bad one, but perhaps it indicates that Cristina doesn't mind so much if the focus during this election is on her pictures.

She may not like the photo highlighting her comparatively large legs. But when people are talking about the girth of her legs, they're not talking about crime and thousands of unpunished kidnappings; they're not talking about the never-ending cycle of theft and bribery at the country's airports; they're not talking about inflation or the credibility of the government's rosy poverty data; they're not talking about Argentina's energy crisis.

They're not talking about Raúl Gaúna.

8 comments:

Anónimo dijo...

Excellent article.

Raquel Barbieri dijo...

Cristina represents a phenomena spread in Argentina in the last fifty years (for the least). In this country, most of the people are more concerned about the external aspect of things than anything else.
As a matter of fact--as I have read in your article--the differences between Hillary’s and Cristina’s websites are astonishing, mainly because of that gap existing between the two candidates.
I think the two women have nothing in common but their female sex, and the further possibility of becoming presidents and rule their countries.
At this point, I don’t think anyone else here has any chance of changing the results, because when you ask a person: - Who are you going to vote next 28th October? No one seems to vote the president’s wife. How is it then? Who votes her?

But she is not the only one who takes profit of her husband’s position. As many others in other fields, she is the wife of someone who facilitated her the way to arrive where she is now. Life is not "Merit-land".

(From what I know, Hillary’s case was different).
I would start to analyze why it is so easy to advance just with the right connections and not always with the accurate preparation.
Why is it too difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, first at home (our inner selves) then in our homes, and finally outside? This is a matter of principle and it may be the beginning of changing our societies little by little.

I am not going to vote Cristina because she spends a lot of money in personal stuff and seems to be more concerned about how she looks than about our poverty… but to those who criticize Kirchner for having helped her to be in the position she is now, I ask them:

- Haven’t you ever helped your wife to reach a goal when she was not the best in that area? Are you sure you are always fair towards your neighbor?

Anyway, the fact is that our next president perhaps wanted to be an actress or a singer and that’s the reason why there are so many pictures and speeches of her everywhere.
Finally, I don’t care about her legs at all. To have beautiful legs is not a merit, but just good luck. I don’t understand why her legs seem to be so important.


I liked your article.
I found you through Alejandro Rozitchner’s blog

Best,
Raquel Barbieri

CLAUDE CONTIN dijo...

It's nice to have you adressing this things.

Diego Coluccio dijo...

Great Blog,

Good to see what someone from abroad thinks about my country.

The woman is not Rabolini by the way.

Rgds,

Colu

Paola dijo...

This article was from revista Noticias, and they were saying it was a "forbidden picture" the "picture CK dont want to be published" and the usual opposition content Noticias make about the Ks. I don't agree with Kirchner, his wife, his politics and the way he is dealing with economy issues at all...I think we are about to fall into a new crisis, as I mentioned in one of my recent articles (www.moneyweekes.com) Clément Juglar could have done his thesis in Argieland, 8-10 years and we are trapped again into a major crisis...plus follow the cycles Alfonsín bad phase, M*n*m I good phase, M*n*m II bad phase, DLR collapse phase, Duhalde and 2002 starting to grow (Q2) ending with K, propelled with an excellent external bonanza (low intl rates before the subprime mess, commodities bull cycle, record borrowing levels in certain countries...real estate top...)...I think that in about to two years from now 'la deblacle nous attend' in the high of the hill again...watching us from there now...

But this picture clealy shows that CK doesnt care a single bit about her legs, the opposite of what Noticias published. Seems they had not had relevant news to cover that day, or lack of ideas...
CK ALWAYS wears those skirts/dresses that show her 'increased volume legs'. And she is not chasing/threatening the media all the time for that (they threaten the media using other ways as official free advertising, etc...). Is this the first pic of her bare legs? no. Will that one be the last one we will see? No. She wears that because she WANTS to show herself like that. Otherwise she would be wearing long hems, dont you think? Check all her pics and you will see she always wears the same hem lengh. Here last trip to the US with K and Clinton. http://www.clarin.com/diario/2007/09/26/um/thumb/kirchnerclinton_tapa.jpg
Because of her activities, she is always pictured with different women personalities and sits and crosses her legs and shows them as she likes to do it.
Conclusion: Cristina does not care about the size of her legs as we do.

CesarP dijo...

Paola has a point. The press in this country seems incredibly superficial. And if the people are willing to buy watch them and then vote for a candidate with such a superficial campaign, maybe they are the superficial ones. Maybe Cristina is just doing what good politicians do best, sink to the lowest common denominator of their constituency.
I also agree that the comparison with Hilary Clinton is nonsense. Hillary Clinton if anything has been critized for having too much political ideology, for believing in taking charge and coming up with a national health care policy... I have yet to meet any Argentinian who can tell me when Cristina ever took a political stance. Being a woman, being the wife of a president, being a senator, and being friends with the Clintons are not political stances.
In any case, thank god for the internet and intelligent journalism like yours and Paola's!

Taos Turner dijo...

Hey Diego,

Many thanks for your comments. It actually IS Rabolini, BTW. No mistake thee.

Cheers, and thanks again,
Taos

Kalakalot dijo...

Great blog, fascinating content. But I can't help but wonder what's up with referring to female politicians by their first names. It happens up here in Alaska (the governor is constantly referred to in the press as "Sarah") and it apparently happens down there in Argentina with "Cristina." It seems disrespectful to me, and also like a deliberate attempt to emphasize these politicians' girliness. (Not that there's anything wrong with girliness in my mind, but there are plenty of people who believe that girliness and an authoratative manner cannot co-exist.)
Then again, the female candidate for the democratic presidential nomination in the US uses "Hillary" on all of her campaign materials, so perhaps it's just a matter of an easy nickname. Maybe some day female political leaders will be so commonplace that women's names won't stand out. Or maybe not.